Subscribe by email
Join 912 other subscribersMeta
Category Archives: bioinformatics
RADseq and missing data: some considerations
Unlike Sanger sequencing, where loci are directly targeted for each individual and sequencing errors are relatively rare, massively multilocus datasets from next generation sequencing platforms are characterized by large amounts of missing data. This is particularly true for restriction digest … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Posted in bioinformatics, genomics, methods, Molecular Ecology, the journal, next generation sequencing, phylogenetics, population genetics, theory
|
Tagged ddRADseq, missing data, null alleles, RADseq
|
6 Comments
Sweeps and Demographic Inference
Population genetics presents us with numerous conundrums – several of which have to do with how the same genomic disposition can be “reached” over evolutionary time with multiple alternate demographic or selective processes. I have discussed several of these issues … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Posted in bioinformatics, evolution, genomics, population genetics, selection, theory
|
Tagged gene flow, genomics, natural selection, population genetics
|
Leave a comment
New branches on the tree of life
(Trees from Darwin (1837), Haeckel (1866), and Woese (1990)) We’ve come quite a long way since Darwin sketched out his tree in 1837 connecting, with branch tips representing animals and microbes currently in existence and branches and trunks their ancestors. … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Posted in bioinformatics, community ecology, evolution, genomics, metagenomics, microbiology, phylogenetics
|
Tagged candidate phyla radiation, Evolution, metagenomics, phylogeny, tree of life
|
1 Comment
Results of the Molecular Ecologist's Survey on High-Throughput Sequencing
Some days ago, we asked our readers to fill in a survey (now closed) on your use of high-throughput sequencing techniques. We got a lot of responses, a total of 260 people filled in the form. Thank you! Here are the results of your answers. The … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Posted in bioinformatics, genomics, next generation sequencing
|
Tagged molecular ecologist, NGS, NGS Field Guide, Sequencing, survey
|
1 Comment
The dangers of not thinking about the relics
No, I’m not talking about Saint Erik’s skull from his beheading in 1160, which (as it turns out) might just be real. A hot topic in microbiology is a different kind of relic. Amazing developments in microbial ecology in recent years … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Posted in bioinformatics, community ecology, metagenomics
|
Tagged metagenomics, qPCR, relic DNA
|
1 Comment
The Molecular Ecologist's Survey on High-Throughput Sequencing
Last week we updated the Field Guide to Next Generation DNA Sequencers to better reflect the sequencing techniques of 2016. The NGS Field Guide is one of the most popular resources on the Molecular Ecologist web site, but we don’t know much about how our readers use … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Posted in bioinformatics, genomics, methods, next generation sequencing
|
Tagged molecular ecologist, NGS, NGS Field Guide, Sequencing, survey
|
2 Comments
RADseq vs. UCEs, round 3
Though reduced-representation genome sequencing (or high-throughput, or nextgen, or massively parallel sequencing, or…) has become standard practice for molecular ecology labs over the past few years, the relative merits of different library preparation methods remains an active area of research. … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Posted in bioinformatics, evolution, genomics, methods, next generation sequencing, phylogenetics
|
Tagged Piranga, RADseq, UCE, ultraconserved elements
|
1 Comment
Battle of the Text Editors
Whether you’re a coding master or a total technophobe, a good text editor is a must-have for the molecular ecology toolkit. Text editors are great for managing code, formatting input files, or jotting notes. But with so many different text … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Veritas Genetics offers $999 (human) genome sequences
Veritas Genetics, a company co-founded by Harvard University geneticist George Church* announced today that it will sequence your genome for less than $1,000. One dollar less, specifically. Up to now, “personal genome” services like 23andMe have used methods that don’t … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Posted in association genetics, bioinformatics, genomics, medicine, next generation sequencing
|
Tagged caveat emptor, medical genomics, Veritas Genetics
|
3 Comments
Geographical Heat Maps in R
I go crazy for fancy data visualizations in R, and a figure in a recent publication has had me wondering if there is an easy way to incorporate density distributions (or as in their case, a distribution of f4 statistics, … Continue reading →
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- More
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp