The Ust'-Ishim Genome

Svante Paabo examines the 45000 year old Ust’-Ishim femur, Image courtesy: The Guardian


This year has been monumental in pulling together several interesting pieces in the human evolution out of Africa puzzle (Lazaridis et al., Ruiz-Linares et al., Skoglund et al., Huerta-Sanchez et al., Jeong et al., Pickrell et al., Raghavan et al., Sankararaman et al., etc.). In a study published last week, Fu et al. report the whole genome sequencing of a 45,000 year old modern human male from Ust’-Ishim in Western Siberia, which offers several conjectures to preceding studies. Genomic analyses reveal that this individual belonged to a population which (a) was more similar to modern day Eurasians than Africans in genetic diversity, (b) contained ~2.3 ± 0.3% of Neanderthal admixture, on similar scales as modern day Asians and Europeans, (c) contained longer IBD tracts of Neanderthal ancestry as expected (the Ust’-Ishim individual lived around the same time period as previously estimated Neanderthal admixture with modern humans out of Africa, around 50-60k ybp).
Perhaps more importantly, this study also estimates autosomal mutation rates using a modified version of PSMC (Li and Durbin, 2011) to be around 0.43 x 10-9 per site per year which is on the lower end of previous studies which use pedigrees, and/or fossil records.

“…these rates are slower than those estimated using calibrations based on the fossil record and thus suggest older dates for the splits of modern human and archaic populations.

While the estimated autosomal mutation rate is perhaps more characteristic of modern humans that were subjected to the out of Africa bottleneck, this study has important implications for other studies that have continued to use larger mutation rates, including those cited above.
Fu, Qiaomei, et al. “Genome sequence of a 45,000-year-old modern human from western Siberia.” Nature 514.7523 (2014): 445-449. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13810
 

Posted in genomics, mutation, Paleogenomics, population genetics | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

The Tortoise Time Warp

Image Credit: Magnus Manske (Flickr)


Recent advances in genetic data analysis continue to provide the ability to reveal some amazingly detailed (and previously unattainable) information about species’ evolutionary history. In this recent study from Molecular Ecology, Dr. Ryan Garrick and colleagues use a variety of genetic data taken from Galápagos tortoises in combination with approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) analyses to document lineage fusion, a traditionally-neglected explanation for radiations in island species.

Yet the importance of fusion events in evolutionary radiations is likely underestimated because incipient lineages tend to fuse so rapidly that the underlying processes are seldom caught in the act, and so empirical evidence appears sparse (Fitzpatrick et al. 2009).

Galápagos giant tortoises provide a particularly interesting example by providing a valuable complement to the extensively documented radiations of Darwin’s finches. Now both enigmatic groups show evidence for reticulate evolutionary histories.

We suggest that, as for Darwin’s finches (Grant et al. 2005), hybridization among Galápagos giant tortoises has been a recurrent feature of their adaptive radiation.

Fitzpatrick B.M., D Kevin Kump, H Bradley Shaffer, Jeramiah J Smith & S Randal Voss (2009). Rapid fixation of non-native alleles revealed by genome-wide SNP analysis of hybrid tiger salamanders, BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9 (1) 176. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-176
Garrick R.C., Michael A. Russello, Chaz Hyseni, Danielle L. Edwards, James P. Gibbs, Washington Tapia, Claudio Ciofi & Adalgisa Caccone (2014). Lineage fusion in Galápagos giant tortoises, Molecular Ecology, 23 (21) 5276-5290. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.12919
Grant P., B. Rosemary Grant, & K. Petren (2005). Hybridization in the Recent Past, The American Naturalist, 166 (1) 56-67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/430331

Posted in Molecular Ecology, the journal, phylogenetics, speciation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New faces: Melissa DeBiasse

New contributor Melissa DeBiasse

New contributor Melissa DeBiasse


This week we’re pleased to welcome a big group of new contributors to the blog. By way of introduction, I asked each of them to answer a few quick questions about him- or herself. —Jeremy
My name is Melissa DeBiasse and I am interested in the mechanisms that determine the distribution of genetic, phenotypic, and physiologic variation in marine invertebrates. My dissertation research in Mike Hellberg’s lab at Louisiana State University used multi-locus model-based methods to infer phylogeographic history and species boundaries in the Caribbean coral reef sponge Callyspongia. As a postdoc in Morgan Kelly’s lab at LSU, I am using experimental methods and transcriptomic data to understand the genomic basis of local adaptation in Tigriopus copepods. I am also interested in increasing the participation of underrepresented groups in STEM fields. When I’m not doing science, I love to run, sew, and enjoy the great food, music, and culture Louisiana has to offer.

Posted in housekeeping, interview, introduction | Leave a comment

New faces: Noah Snyder-Mackler

New contributor Noah Snyder-Mackler.

New contributor Noah Snyder-Mackler.


This week we’re pleased to welcome a big group of new contributors to the blog. By way of introduction, I asked each of them to answer a few quick questions about him- or herself. —Jeremy
Who are you? Is this an existential question? I guess my answer is that I’m Noah Snyder-Mackler – a researcher who studies non-human primate genetics and genomics at Duke University, but that’s not that deep, is it? A bit more: I received my BA in Psychology from the University of Pennsylvania in 2007 and my PhD from the same department and institution in 2012. My dissertation work focused on understanding social and genetic structure of the complex society of the gelada monkey.
Where are you? This one is definitely easier to answer than “Who am I?”. I’m currently a postdoc in Jenny Tung’s lab in the Department of Evolutionary Anthropology at Duke University.
Continue reading

Posted in housekeeping, interview, introduction | Leave a comment

New faces: Stacy Krueger-Hadfield

New contributor Stacy A. Krueger-Hadfield

New contributor Stacy A. Krueger-Hadfield


This week we’re pleased to welcome a big group of new contributors to the blog. By way of introduction, I asked each of them to answer a few quick questions about him- or herself. —Jeremy
Who are you? Stacy A. Krueger-Hadfield.
Where are you? Currently, a post-doctoral fellow at the College of Charleston, based at the Grice Marine Laboratory.
What do you study? I am an evolutionary ecologist. Though I have dabbled with some animal models, I mainly use marine algae (both macro- and micro-) to address questions pertaining to population connectivity in marine environments, life history evolution and the impacts of global climate change on marine populations. Currently, I am a co-PI on NSF-funded research investigating the invasive history of the red seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla in which we are using a combination of genotype and phenotype to explore the impacts of the invasion along both North American and European coastlines. For more information, see my website and the research page (www.quooddy.com).
What do you do when you’re not studying it? I enjoy traveling, reading, writing (in all forms) and taking pictures.

Posted in housekeeping, interview, introduction | 1 Comment

WTF (What's The Function?)

Schoolhouse Rock!

Schoolhouse Rock!


Jay Shendure’s editorial, “Life after genetics”, points out that we, as geneticists, should shift our focus from variant-finding (e.g., GWAS) to understanding the functional implications of disease-associated variants:

“We are in a period of rich discovery in human genetics and genomics. The ascertainment of genetic variation, previously the rate-limiting step for genetic analysis, has been revolutionized by new technologies for high-density genotyping, exome sequencing and genome sequencing.

Amid this success, it is important to remember that genetics is a means to one or several ends (such as a biological understanding of disease mechanisms, or identifying the basis of disease in a specific patient) rather than an end in itself. The ultimate impact of our field will depend not only on whether we can get the genetics right, but also on whether or not subsequent goals are achieved.”

The editorial is aimed at human geneticists, but the message rings true for all who study genetics – molecular ecologists included. Finding a genotype-phenotype association is just the first step. We should strive for a more in depth and comprehensive understanding.
Shendure’s editorial highlights some potential ways to bridge the gap between genotype and function. One possible route is the using the rapidly developing in vitro genome editing techniques, such as CRISPR/Cas9.
One could easily extend this editorial to include other genomic-phenotype associations, including epigenetic modifications. Great, so you’ve found an association. What’s the function?
Jay Shendure. 2014. Life after genetics. Genome Medicine. doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0086-2.

Posted in genomics, medicine, mutation, next generation sequencing | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

New faces: Rob Denton

New contributor Rob Denton

New contributor Rob Denton


This week we’re pleased to welcome a big group of new contributors to the blog. By way of introduction, I asked each of them to answer a few quick questions about him- or herself. —Jeremy
Who are you? I’m a 4th year PhD candidate in the Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology at Ohio State University.
Where are you? Columbus, Ohio, USA
What do you study? North America is home to one of the weirdest amphibians in the world, a group of all-female salamanders that mainly reproduce clonally but occasionally “steal” sperm from males of other species. This method of reproduction is unique among vertebrates and has been around for quite a long time (~6 million years), but it is difficult to explain how this all-female lineage stays in balance with the sexual salamanders that they take advantage of by having their cake (not making males) and eating it too (still getting new genetic diversity). I study some of factors that may drive the coexistence between sexual salamander species and this all-female lineage.
What do you do when you’re not studying it? Academically, I’m also interested in the science of teaching and learning, especially how inquiry and technology affect students’ learning. Non-academically, I’m a husband, father, homebrewer, and hockey fan. I’m lucky enough that my job takes me to do a lot of things that I enjoy outside of work anyway, like traveling to interesting places and finding wildlife.

Posted in housekeeping, interview, introduction | Leave a comment

New faces: Arun Sethuraman

New contributor Arun Sethuraman

New contributor Arun Sethuraman


This week we’re pleased to welcome a big group of new contributors to the blog. By way of introduction, I asked each of them to answer a few quick questions about him- or herself. —Jeremy
Who are you? Arun Sethuraman, Postdoctoral Associate/Scientific Programmer
Where are you? Lab of Jody Hey at the Center for Computational Genetics and Genomics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
What do you study? I am a computational biologist, and I build statistical models and tools for population genetics. I am particularly interested in studying the dynamics of structured populations, genetic admixture, and ancestral demography.
What do you you do when you’re not studying it? I binge-read Man Booker Prize nominees/winners, write short-short stories/monologues/plays on my blog (www.wordsworthless.blogspot.com), bust myths about academics being unfashionable, and bike the Schuylkill trail.

Posted in housekeeping, interview, introduction | Leave a comment

What we're reading: The diversification of bacteria, landscape genomics of cottonwood, and the skewed sex ratio of science


In the journals
Plata G., C.S. Henry, and D. Vitkup. 2014. Long-term phenotypic evolution of bacteria. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature13827.

Overall, bacterial phenotypic evolution can be described by a two-stage process with a rapid initial phenotypic diversification followed by a slow long-term exponential divergence. The observed average divergence trend, with approximately similar fractions of phenotypic properties changing per unit time, continues for billions of years.

Geraldes, A., N. Farzaneh, C. J. Grassa, A. D. McKown, R. D. Guy, S. D. Mansfield, C. J. Douglas, and Q. C. B. Cronk. 2014. Landscape genomics of Populus trichocarpa: the role of hybridization, limited gene flow, and natural selection in shaping patterns of population structure. Evolution. 68(11):3260–3280. doi: 10.1111/evo.12497.

Gene Ontology analyses revealed that FST outliers are overrepresented in genes involved in circadian rhythm and response to red/far-red light when the entire dataset is considered, whereas in southern BC heat response genes are overrepresented.

In the news
“Although we may never fully understand all the reasons that led to the skewed sex ratio problem we experience today, we will at least have cured the ill. And personally I’d rather be rid of the problem while not completely understanding it, than fully understanding it and not having solved it.”
“Below you’ll find a small fraction of those outstanding contemporary female naturalists that you may never have heard of but who are contributing greatly to our understanding of the natural world.”
“The letter disinvites any registrants [for the annual meeting of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene] who’ve cared for people with Ebola in the last three weeks. ‘In Louisiana, we love to welcome visitors, but we must balance that hospitality with the protection of Louisiana residents and other visitors,’ the state officials said.”

Posted in linkfest | Leave a comment

Haldane's Sieve

Haldane_Sieve_betterThis week we have a guest post by Graham Coop and Joe Pickrell. Here, Graham [GC] and Joe [JKP] answer a few questions we had about the development and future of their blog, Haldane’s Sieve. If you’re interested in population genetics it’s definitely worth your time to take a look at and follow the blog. We would also like to hear what the readers of the The Molecular Ecologist think of Haldane’s Sieve and its place in the research community, so feel free to post in the comments section below.
1. Can you explain what Haldane’s Sieve is, and what service it provides to the science community?
Haldane’s Sieve is a site designed for the promotion and discussion of preprints in evolutionary genetics and genomics. Each day we post abstracts and links to the preprints that have appeared on the arXiv & bioRxiv and fall broadly in evolutionary genomics. We also invite authors to write posts giving informal summaries of their work,  e.g. explaining the story behind the paper or highlighting some part of the work that they find particularly exciting. All papers also have comment threads where readers can give feedback, and we also have the occasional post with a detailed review of a paper.
[GC] It’s been really great to see so many people in the community embracing preprints over the past few years, and evolutionary genetics and genomics being central to the move towards preprints in biology. It’s great that Haldane’s sieve has played some role in that, especially as it started from a idle chat on a saturday afternoon that hit on a great name for a preprint website. It’s also been wonderful to see a number of biology journals change towards preprint friendly policies in response to authors really wanting to engage with preprints.
Continue reading

Posted in blogging, community, interview, peer review, science publishing | Leave a comment