Journals must boost data sharing

Here’s the text from Tim’s recent (3rd April) Correspondence piece in Nature
The journal ecosystem is a powerful filter of scientific literature, promoting the best work into the best journals. Why not use a similar mechanism to encourage more comprehensive data sharing? Several journals have introduced policies mandating that data be shared on a public archive at publication (see, for example, here).
However, these have met with limited success, perhaps because of authors’ fear of losing control, being scooped in subsequent papers or having errors exposed. Moreover, compliance with data sharing policies is typically only checked after the paper has been accepted.
To spur excellence in data sharing, journals must recognize that better sharing leads to stronger papers, and judge submissions accordingly. Articles associated with feeble sharing efforts should either improve or be rejected. A focus on publishing verifiable research will boost journal reputation. It also signals to the community of authors that withholding data will restrict them to publication in less prestigious journals.
Timothy H. Vines,
University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, Canada

Posted in data archiving, science publishing | Leave a comment

What we're reading: Genomics for conservation, SNPs versus microsats, and imbalance in the peer-review ecosystem

Bookshelf
In the journals
Harrisson K.A., A. Pavlova, M. Telonis-Scott and P. Sunnucks. 2014. Using genomics to characterize evolutionary potential for conservation of wild populations. Evolutionary Applications. doi: 10.1111/eva.12149.

… screening genome-wide variation should be a sensible approach that may provide a generalized measure of evolutionary potential that accounts for the contributions of small-effect loci and cryptic variation and is robust to uncertainty about future change and required adaptive response(s).

Lozier J.D. 2014. Revisiting comparisons of genetic diversity in stable and declining species: assessing genome-wide polymorphism in North American bumble bees using RAD sequencing. Molecular Ecology. 23:788–801. doi: 10.1111/mec.12636.

Previous microsatellite-based analyses have shown that gene diversity is lower in the declining [Bombus] pensylvanicus than in B. impatiens. RADseq nucleotide diversities appear much more similar in the two species.

Petchey O.L., J.W. Fox, L. Haddon. 2014. Imbalance in individual researcher’s peer review activities quantified for four British Ecological Society journals, 2003-2010. PLoS ONE 9: e92896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092896. (See also discussion by author Jeremy Fox at Dynamic Ecology)

The majority of researchers (64%) did not have balanced contributions and withdrawals. Depending on assumptions, 12% to 44% contributed more than twice as much as required; 20% to 52% contributed less than half as much as required.

In the news
“In the face of climate change, scientists like [Ruth] Shaw have begun to measure how effective evolution might be as a survival strategy.”
“Observers lauded [David] Wright’s appointment in December 2011 … But on 25 February, he fired off a fiery resignation letter to his boss (see below), HHS Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH) Howard Koh.”
“But after a few years … you are given the chance to reflect and summarize, even rewrite your own narrative. You’ve identified collaborators and programs that make your collective program greater than the sum of its parts.”
“But just as the spherical cow is logically rigorous but of limited empirical insight, so the relentless tautologies of adaptationism leave us in the dark as to how human cultural and social diversity came about.”
“The problem is that most people don’t know what ‘the flu’ is, and relying on Google searches by people who may be utterly ignorant about the flu does not produce useful information.”
“So upon their predictable failure (in the free national labor market!) to turn up a qualified candidate, they wound up with a man whose views on issues relevant to the course are not only outside the scientific mainstream, but are demonstrably, factually incorrect and who likely has in the past abused such a position to advance his agenda.”

Posted in linkfest | Leave a comment

Do you sign your peer reviews?

John Hancock
Update: The survey is now closed! Thanks to everyone who participated—I’ll post the results soon.
Yesterday John Stanton-Geddes e-mailed me and Tim Vines to ask about writing a post, or a series of posts, on the question of whether or not scientists should sign the reviews they write for papers submitted to scientific journals. I got the e-mail within, I think, about 30 minutes of seeing that Terry McGlynn had tackled just that topic in a new post over at Small Pond Science. So this seems to be a topic worth discussing!
But it occurred to me that it’d be nice to have a sense of the consensus (or lack thereof) within our general field of evolutionary ecology, as background for that discussion. So I’ve set up a Google Docs poll to ask our readers: do you sign your peer reviews? It’s seven quick questions, and the last one is a chance to volunteer your contribution to an upcoming discussion of anonymity and peer review. Go here to tell us what you think. Thanks in advance!

Posted in peer review, science publishing | 1 Comment

Job: Deputy Managing Editor for Molecular Ecology

Here’s a job opening for anyone that’s interested:
The Molecular Ecology Editorial Office is looking for a part- or full-time Deputy Managing Editor to help run Molecular Ecology and ME Resources. The position chiefly involves monitoring the peer review process and interacting with subject editors, reviewers, and authors.
The ideal candidate would have postgraduate level expertise in the field of molecular ecology, a talent for critically evaluating scientific papers, and an excellent eye for detail. Strong writing and time management skills are also essential. Experience with Next Generation Sequencing would be helpful.
The position is available immediately and is based in Vancouver, Canada. Salary is negotiable depending on experience, and is based on initially working 15-20 hrs per week. The position can move toward full time hours (40/week) in due course.
If this is the right job for you, please email your resume and the names of two referees to tim@molecol.com
Tim Vines

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

People behind the Science: Dr. Charles Goodnight

This month, we touch on the always-exciting topic of multilevel selection in our Q&A feature with Dr. Charles Goodnight of the University of Vermont. In addition to his work on multi-level selection, Dr. Goodnight has also studied the effects of founder effects and epistasis on evolution. Below, Dr. Goodnight explains why you should be nice to the “old” scientists you meet at conferences, argues for a phenotype-centric view of evolution, and explains how aliens might perceive human civilization. You can read more of Dr. Goodnight’s thoughts at his blog Evolution in Structured Populations
1) Tell us a bit about your background – what got you into studying evolution?
Looking back I was really lucky in how many important biologists I met throughout my childhood. My parents were both biologists. My father was on a 9 month appointment we would take vacations that were a month long or more. My parents were Opilionid taxonomists, and I traveled with my parents collecting “daddy longlegs” throughout the Mexico and Central America. By the time I graduated from high school I had been to every state in the continental United States, most of Canada, every state in Mexico, and every country in Central America. I had also tagged along on several graduate courses that my parents taught, and generally spent a lot of time hanging around labs and field stations. By the time I was in high school I was convinced I wanted to be an ecologist. Later in college, at the University of Michigan I was exposed to courses by Warren Wagner, Arnold Kluge and Donald Tinkle, and realized that evolution was much more interesting to me.

Dr. Charles Goodnight. Photo from http://www.uvm.edu/~uvmpr/?Page=News&storyID=16131

Dr. Charles Goodnight. Image from http://www.uvm.edu/~uvmpr/?Page=News&storyID=16131


I should also mention that over the years I have been extremely lucky in the influential people I have met. Apparently, as a baby I sat on the lap of Victor Shelford, my father’s graduate advisor. I strongly suspect I met Ernst Mayr as a child, but of course I was completely un-impressed at the time, and many others that of course I don’t remember. Later as a first year graduate student my advisor Mike Wade took me to a symposium he was speaking at. While there I sat next to this old guy, and this really old guy. It turns out the old guy was James Crow, and the really old guy was Sewall Wright. That meeting I also got a chance to speak with Richard Lewontin. In any case, if I wasn’t determined to be an evolutionary biologist before that meeting, I certainly was afterwards.
Continue reading

Posted in interview, population genetics, quantitative genetics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Want to see us in your Facebook News Feed? You should probably do this one weird thing.

Click this, please.

Click this, please.


A whole lot of folks—875!—have “liked” the Molecular Ecologist page on Facebook, which ought to mean that all those people see new posts from the site right in their Facebook News Feed. But we’ve found that our Facebook posts are typically seen by a lot fewer than 875 folks—and the number seems to be declining. This may be a symptom of something happening with Facebook pages in general—fewer posts are reaching the people who’ve “liked” pages, possibly because there are just more pages to “like.” The solution offered by FB is to pay for placement in people’s news feeds, but this “promotion” can reach a lot of people who really aren’t interested, and that’s not why we have a Facebook page in the first place.
If you want to ensure that posts from The Molecular Ecologist make it into your News Feed, there is one thing you can do: Turn on the “get notifications” option on our page. This is illustrated above—it’s in a drop-down menu attached to the “Like” button itself. Selecting “get notifications” tells Facebook’s News Feed algorithm to give our posts priority in your feed.
And, if you want a less convoluted option, you can also receive Molecular Ecologist posts on Twitter, via RSS subscription, and even by e-mail, using the tools in our sidebar.
(Hat tip to the Facebook page for Small Pond Science for pointing me toward that recent article about the declining audience for FB pages. Ironic sourcing? Yes, maybe.)

Posted in housekeeping, technical | Leave a comment

Crowd-sourcing natural history

Lygopodium palmatum
What I think of as my first “real” science job was a year I spent in Pittsburgh, interning for the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy. One of my most enjoyable duties was assisting a WPC ecologist on systematic surveys of plant diversity at a series of study plots out in the mountains. If I recall correctly, the point of the project was actually to assess collateral damage done to spring ephemerals and other understory plants by various herbicides that timber companies wanted to use to prevent striped maple from taking over recently clear-cut tracts of forest.
But before I could be much use out in the woods, I needed to learn to identify the plant species we’d be tracking. So my boss took me down to the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, where I spent a few afternoons leafing through specimen sheets at the herbarium. It wasn’t the same thing as seeing actual, live plants in the field, but it gave me a head start on learning the distinguishing characteristics of the species we were most likely to find.
Continue reading

Posted in citizen science, community, methods | 8 Comments

What we're reading: Arabidopsis vs slugs, the long reach of a GWAS hit, and post-pub peer review comes into its own?

Untitled
In the journals
Falk, K. L., J. Kästner, N. Bodenhausen, K. Schramm, C. Paetz, D. G. Vassão, M. Reichelt, D. von Knorre, J. Bergelson, M. Erb, J. Gershenzon, and S. Meldau. 2013. The role of glucosinolates and the jasmonic acid pathway in resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana against molluscan herbivores. Molecular Ecology. 1188–1203.

Our data highlight the function of well-known antiherbivore defence pathways in resistance against slugs and snails and suggest an important role for the diurnal regulation of defence metabolites against nocturnal molluscan herbivores.

Smemo, S., J. J. Tena, K.-H. Kim, E. R. Gamazon, N. J. Sakabe, C. Gómez-Marín, I. Aneas, F. L. Credidio, D. R. Sobreira, N. F. Wasserman, J. H. Lee, V. Puviindran, D. Tam, M. Shen, J. E. Son, N. A. Vakili, H.-K. Sung, S. Naranjo, R. D. Acemel, M. Mazanares, A. Nagy, N. J. Cox, C.-C. Hui, J. L. Gomez-Skarmeta, and M. A. Nóbrega. 2014. Obesity-associated variants within FTO form long-range functional connections with IRX3. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature13138.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have reproducibly assoc- iated variants within introns of FTO with increased risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although the molecular mechanisms linking these noncoding variants with obesity are not immediately obvious, subsequent studies in mice demonstrated that FTO expression levels influence body mass and composition phenotypes. However, no direct connection between the obesity-associated variants and FTO expression or function has been made. Here we show that the obesity-associated noncoding sequences within FTO are functionally connected, at megabase distances, with the homeobox gene IRX3.

In the news
“In a new policy, PLoS requires PIs to cut and deposit one of their fingers every time they submit a paper, or at least that is the sense you get after reading the reactions about ‘new policy’ online.”
“… consider that one could easily have applied nearly all of the arguments people having been making in the blogosphere these past two weeks to that dastardly scientific timesink that is the common Methods sections.”
“The papers’ comment threads on PubPeer have attracted some 40000 viewers. It’s hardly surprising they caught issues that three overworked referees and a couple of editors did not.”

Posted in linkfest | 1 Comment

The broom of the system: Tracking soft selective sweeps in bacteria colonizing the gut

ποντίκι / μυς, mouse (Mus musculus) by George Shuklin
Evolution inside this mouse’s gut (and yours) is more complex than you might think.

A growing body of population genetic evidence suggests that adaptive evolutionary change often proceeds via soft selective sweeps, in which beneficial mutations on multiple genetic backgrounds—and potentially at multiple loci—all increase in frequency, but none achieve fixation. This process has been directly tracked in populations of HIV within patients receiving antiretroviral drugs; and now a recent paper in PLOS Genetics finds that soft sweeps are integral in the adaptation of bacteria to the mammalian gut.

João Barroso-Batista and colleagues at the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência and Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica in Portugal first treated mice with streptomycin to clear their guts of bacteria, then fed them cultures of Escherichia coli that were genetically uniform—except that half the E. coli cells in the culture had been engineered to produce a blue fluorescent protein, and half had been engineered to produce a yellow fluorescent protein. Any adaptation to the mouse guts would have to occur via new mutation, which might pop up in either a blue or a yellow cell. If a single mutation made that one cell so successful that its descendants entirely dominated the gut, the authors would be able to tell—by checking the color of the host mouse’s poop.

Yes, you read that correctly.

Continue reading
Posted in adaptation, microbiology, population genetics | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

What we're reading: A single gene for Batesian mimicry, the genetics of interspecies incompatibility, and further debate over data sharing

book reading
In the journals
Kunte K., W. Zhang, A. Tenger-Trolander, D. H. Palmer, A. Martin, R. D. Reed, S. P. Mullen, and M. R. Kronforst. 2014. doublesex is a mimicry supergene. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature13112.

Using an integrative approach combining genetic and association mapping, transcriptome and genome sequencing, and gene expression analyses, we show that a single gene, doublesex, controls supergene mimicry in Papilio polytes.

(See also commentary by David Loehlin and Sean Carroll.)
Fraïsse C., J. A. D. Elderfield, and J. J. Welch. 2014. The genetics of speciation: are complex incompatibilities easier to evolve? J. Evolutionary Biology. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12339.

Experimental crosses show that such Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities (DMIs) are often complex (involving alleles at three or more loci) and asymmetrical (such that reciprocal introgressions have very different effects on fitness). One possible explanation is that asymmetrical and complex DMIs are ‘easier to evolve’, because they block fewer of the possible evolutionary paths between the parental genotypes.

In the news
“I’d like to think that people want to work with me because of what I can bring to the table other than my data, but I’m not keen on testing that working hypothesis.”
“So I say suck it up, share the data behind the paper, manage your data well, and let’s all get on with our lives.”
“Ask anyone in academics whether you’d rather have 6 citations from awesome papers or 6 awesome papers and 100% of them will take the papers.”
“This is an R wrapper to the NOAA climate data API.”
“I would like to place a vertical bar next to all the tips descended for a node that I specify [on my phylogeny]. How do I do this?”

Posted in linkfest | Leave a comment