Who belongs at the root of the animal tree?

sponge photo credit ryanphotographic.com, ctenophore photo credit Stefan Siebert

sponge photo credit Paddy Ryan, ctenophore photo credit Stefan Siebert

Resolving the tree of life is a consequential goal of evolutionary biology and over the last several years there has been much research devoted to determining the relationships among the earliest branching animal lineages. As a scientist who studies sponges and cnidarians (taxa near the base of the animal tree), I have much enjoyed seeing new results come in and watching the debate evolve.

One hypothesis is that sponges (the Porifera) are our most distant animal relatives. This view has been supported by Phillippe et al. (2009), Pick et al. (2010), Nosenko et al. (2013), and Dorhmann & Wörheide (2013). The alternative hypothesis that ctenophores, the comb jellies (phylum Ctenophora), are sister to all other animals is supported by work from Dunn et al. (2008), Hejnol et al. (2009), Ryan et al. (2013), Moroz et al. (2014), Whelan et al. (2015), and Borowiec et al. (2015).

These studies included different ingroup and outgroup taxa, different genetic markers, and have used different phylogenetic methods, often yielding conflicting results. For example, Nosenko et al. (2013) found the position of the ctenophores varied between two multi-gene partitions (see figure below).

Fig. 2. Comparative analyses of two multi-gene partitions. (A) Bayesian consensus tree inferred from the analysis of the ribosomal gene partition containing 14,615 aa positions and 63 terminal taxa. The PPs were obtained from the analyses of the ribosomal sub-matrices containing 63, 56, 49, and 42 taxa (Table 1). The solid circles indicate maximum PP support (100%) from all datasets. The blue color indicates species excluded from the 56- to 42-taxa sub-matrices; the red color indicates species excluded from the 49- to 42-taxa sub-matrices. Due to the conflicting relative positions of mertensiid sp. 3 and Pleurobrachia pileus in different trees, the corresponding node was collapsed. (B) Bayesian consensus tree inferred from the analysis of the non-ribosomal gene partition containing 9187 amino acid positions and 50 terminal taxa. The PP and scale bars are as in Fig. 1. All trees were constructed under the CAT + C model.

Comparative analyses of two multi-gene partitions. Figure from Nosenko et al. (2013).

The latest paper in the mix by Pisani et al. (2015) reinstates sponges (for the moment, at least) as the sister group of all other extant animals. Recently, Casey Dunn, one of the major players in the effort to resolve the animal phylogeny, wrote a great perspective on the Pisani et al. paper and the quest to find the sister group to all other animals. Check out his post here: Who is our most distant animal relative?


About Melissa DeBiasse

I am a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Florida Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience. As an evolutionary ecologist I am interested in the processes that generate biodiversity in marine ecosystems. My research uses experimental methods and genomic and phenotypic data to test how marine invertebrate species respond to biotic and abiotic stressors over ecological and evolutionary timescales.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Nicolas Bekkouche

    The link on the Dunn’s perspective is not available, is there another link to have a look at it ? 🙂

    • Looks like it works for me. Some glitch at Medium?

      • Nicolas Bekkouche

        I have acces now, that must have been a problem, thank you 😉 Very interesting answer though 🙂

  • Pingback: Top three of 2015 – Melissa DeBiasse | The Molecular Ecologist()