What we're reading

Books

As we head into the weekend, here’s a few things we’ve found that might be worth your screen time.
In the journals
Draghi, J. a & Whitlock, M.C. 2012. Phenotypic plasticity facilitates mutational variance, genetic variance, and evolvability along the major axis of environmental variation. Evolution 66: 2891–902. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01649.x.

Phenotypic plasticity tends to lead to populations with greater mutational variance, greater standing genetic variance, and, when the optimal phenotypes of two traits vary in concert, greater mutational and genetic correlations. However, plastic populations do not tend to respond much more rapidly to selection than do populations evolved in a static environment.

Scanlan, P.D., Hall, a R., Burlinson, P., Preston, G. & Buckling, A. 2012. No effect of host-parasite co-evolution on host range expansion. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26: 205–209. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12021.

Although all co-evolved phage had a greater host range than the ancestral phage and could differentially infect co-evolved variants of P. fluorescens SBW25, none could infect any of the alternative P. fluorescens strains. Thus, parasite generalism at one genetic scale does not appear to affect generalism at other scales, suggesting funda- mental genetic constraints on parasite adaptation for this virus.

In the blogosphere
From the 2012 edition of the University of British Columbia Zoology Huts Skit, the inevitable academic parody of “Call Me Maybe.”

Posted in linkfest | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Knowing what I know now: The carnival

Advice

Ever since I posted some retrospective advice for grad school last month and Scicurious proposed a Carnival of Advice, folks have been sending in reflections on their previous career stage.
The result is exactly what I’d hoped for — a chorus of advice from different perspectives, out of which you can start to hear common themes: the importance of self-discipline, but also self-care; the value of professional and personal relationships; and the stress-relieving power of time in the kitchen or outdoors. To write this up, I’ve pulled a single bullet point from each contribution, but everyone had far more to say than I can render into neat little sound-bites. As with all blog carnivals, this is really just a series of prompts for you to go Read the Whole Thing.
Without further ado, here’s what we’d have done differently, if only we’d known then what we know now:
Continue reading

Posted in career | Tagged , , | 13 Comments

What we're reading

Day 180: in the stacks

As we head into the weekend, here’s a few things we’ve noticed that might be worth your screen time.
In the journals
Desai, M.M., Walczak, A.M. & Fisher, D.S. 2012. Genetic diversity and the structure of genealogies in rapidly adapting populations. Genetics 1–49. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.147157.

Here, we introduce an effective coalescent theory (a “fitness-class coales- cent”) that describes how positive selection at many perfectly linked sites alters the structure of genealogies. We use this theory to calculate several simple statistics describing genetic variation within a rapidly adapting pop- ulation, and to implement efficient backwards-time coalescent simulations which can be used to predict how clonal interference alters the expected patterns of molecular evolution.

Coiffard, C., Gomez, B., Daviero-Gomez, V. & Dilcher, D.L. 2012. Rise to dominance of angiosperm pioneers in European Cretaceous environments. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 49: 49–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218633110.

We propose a scenario for the rise to dominance of the angiosperms from the Barremian (ca. 130 Ma) to the Campanian (ca. 84 Ma) based on the European megafossil plant record. These megafossil data demonstrate that angiosperms migrated into new environments in three phases: (i) Barremian (ca. 130–125 Ma) freshwater lake-related wetlands; (ii) Aptian–Albian (ca. 125–100 Ma) understory floodplains (excluding levees and back swamps); and (iii) Cenomanian–Campanian (ca. 100–84 Ma) natural levees, back swamps, and coastal swamps.

In the blogosphere
Wired picks the year’s best data visualizations. Think you can do better? You should check out this graph makeover contest at Forbes.
And here’s some delightful footage of an undescribed species of peacock spider.

Posted in linkfest | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Knowing what I know now: Grad school (Katie Lotterhos)

Mind your Ps and Qs

Katie Lotterhos completed her PhD in 2011 at Florida State University, and is currently a post-doc with Mike Whitlock at the University of British Columbia. She studies marine ecology, population genetics, and statistical genomics.
If you have advice for yourself in a past career stage, find out how to contribute to the carnival here — we’ve got many great contributions already!
I don’t like wordy posts, but here’s my two cents. I actually put this together for some undergrads I’ve been teaching, but it applies to grad students as well.
Continue reading

Posted in career | Tagged | 2 Comments

What we're reading

20091204_Hermitage_library_002

As we head into the weekend, here’s a few things that we’ve noticed that might be worth your screen time.
In the journals
Wilfert L., Jiggins F. 2012. The dynamics of reciprocal selective sweeps of host resistance and a parasite counter-adaptation in Drosophila. Evolution. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01832.x.

To illustrate the dynamics of this important but little studied form of coevolution, we have modeled an ongoing arms race between Drosophila melanogaster and the vertically transmitted sigma virus, using parameters we estimated in the field. We integrate these results with previous work showing that the spread of a resistance allele of the ref(2)P gene in the host was followed by the spread of a virus genotype, which overcomes this resistance. In line with these observations, our model predicts that there can be rapid selective sweeps in both the host and parasite, which can drive large changes in the prevalence of infection.

Curtis B. a., Tanifuji G., Burki F., Gruber A., Irimia M., et al. 2012. Algal genomes reveal evolutionary mosaicism and the fate of nucleomorphs. Nature. DOI: 10.1038/nature11681.

Cryptophyte and chlorarachniophyte algae are transitional forms in the widespread secondary endosymbiotic acquisition of photosynthesis by engulfment of eukaryotic algae. Unlike most secondary plastid-bearing algae, miniaturized versions of the endosymbiont nuclei (nucleomorphs) persist in cryptophytes and chlorarachniophytes. To determine why, and to address other fundamental questions about eukaryote–eukaryote endosymbiosis, we sequenced the nuclear genomes of the cryptophyte Guillardia theta and the chlorarachniophyte Bigelowiella natans.

Tibayrenc M., Ayala F.J. 2012. Reproductive clonality of pathogens: A perspective on pathogenic viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasitic protozoa. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:E3305–13. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212452109.

We propose that clonal evolution in micropathogens be defined as restrained recombination on an evolutionary scale, with genetic exchange scarce enough to not break the prevalent pattern of clonal population structure, a definition already widely used for all kinds of pathogens, although not clearly formulated by many scientists and rejected by others.

In the blogosphere
Project EvoMap is putting biology labs and research groups on the, um, geographic visualization.
Are ecologists abusing ANOVA?

Posted in linkfest | Leave a comment

Knowing what I know now: Grad school (Sean Hoban)

Vegan banana muffins

Another vote for cooking as stress relief. Mmm, stress relief.


Sean Hoban is a postdoc at the University of Ferrara, Italy, where he develops software and evaluates methods for conservation genetics, with Oscar Gaggiotti and Giorgio Bertorelle.  Their user-friendly software for choosing the appropriate number of markers and samples for a genetic study is available here (manuscript in press at Methods in Ecology and Evolution). Their recent prospectus on genetic simulation software is here.  Sean is also an editor for invasivore.org, and a contributor to ESA’s blog Ecotone.
If you have advice for yourself in a past career stage, find out how to contribute to the carnival here — we’ve got many great contributions already!
Foster collaborations
Increasingly, good science takes place in collaborations, especially between researchers and non-researchers, and between disciplines.  You will likely have opportunity to work formally and informally with other institutions, natural resource agencies, NGOs, educators, etc.  As such opportunities arise, nurture these relationships!  (1) Keep a spreadsheet of your contacts, the date you last communicated, various “to-do” items, etc.  This will help you find potential collaborators or employers months or years later. (2) Share new results and questions with them- this helps to circulate your findings among the community and shows that you appreciate people’s past involvement in your work.  Do not use and then forget people- you will meet and rely on them again.  As my advisor said, “science is a small town.”
Acknowledge the help of others
As others have stressed, it is true that all responsibility and onus is on you to get things done.  Still, you must remember that accomplishments are a team product- your lab manager, field technicians, undergraduate assistants, advisors.  There was a phase of my graduate career when I looked at my accomplishments and knowledge, and felt pretty cocky, and selfish of “my data.”  Get over that feeling fast, and thank those behind the scenes.
Continue reading

Posted in career | Tagged , | Leave a comment

What we're reading. Well, eating, anyway.

Turkey

Speller C.F., Kemp B.M., Wyatt S.D., Monroe C., Lipe W.D., Arndt U.M., Yang D.Y. 2010. Ancient mitochondrial DNA analysis reveals complexity of indigenous North American turkey domestication. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:2807–12.

Although the cultural and nutritive importance of the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) to precontact Native Americans and contem- porary people worldwide is clear, little is known about the domestication of this bird compared to other domesticates. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of 149 turkey bones and 29 coprolites from 38 archaeological sites (200 BC–AD 1800) reveals a unique domesticated breed in the precontact Southwestern United States. Phylogeographic analyses indicate that this domestic breed originated from outside the region, but rules out the South Mexican domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) as a progenitor. A strong genetic bottleneck within the Southwest turkeys also reflects intensive human selection and breeding. This study points to at least two occurrences of turkey domestication in precontact North America and illuminates the intensity and sophistication of New World animal breeding practices.

Posted in linkfest | Leave a comment

A comparison of bioinformatics programming languages

If you program enough, it can change the way you look at the world…


The times are a-changin and most molecular ecologists and evolutionary biologists are no longer asking themselves, “Should I learn a programming language?”, but rather “Which programming language should I learn?”. There are a variety of programming languages that are used by the bioinformatics community, and the number of bioinformatics-compatible computer languages available is on the rise. As such, it can be a little daunting to decide which programming languages to master. From my perusing of various online forums, many professional programmers will insist that you should pick a programming language that works best for each particular purpose.  I somewhat agree with that sentiment, but how many languages can you realistically expect to learn?  Furthermore, it is often more efficient to be an expert in a handful of languages than to be an intermediate-level programmer in a greater number of languages.  On the flip-side, being dogmatically attached to a single language can be detrimental to productivity. From a statistical and quantitative point of view, I prefer R because it is open source.  I also like Linux as both a glue to bind analyses and for quick data management tasks.  But what language should you use for all those other bioinformatics-type tasks that you need to accomplish (e.g., filtering reads, mapping reads, parsing BLAST files, identifying SNPs)?
Continue reading

Posted in bioinformatics, next generation sequencing, software | 10 Comments

What we're reading

Libraries are Creepy

As we head into the weekend, here’s a few things that might be worth your screen-time.
In the journals
Shull, G. 1909. The “presence and absence” hypothesis. The American Naturalist 43:410–419. DOI: 10.1086/279073.

The “presence and absence” hypothesis assumes that what appears to be a pair of charactersin Mendelian inheritance is really the presence and absence of a single character. This hypothesis has now won the support of most of the leading experimental students of heredity. The fact that the absence of certain characters dominates over their presence has appeared to some to be a difficulty. This paper shows that no such difficultyis involved and simple chemical experimentsare cited which, if duplicated among plants and animals, as they no doubt are, would give the dominance of absence over presence without recourse to “inhibiting factors.”

Wang, I. J., R. E. Glor and J. B. Losos. 2012. Quantifying the roles of ecology and geography in spatial genetic divergence. Ecology Letters. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12025.

Both ecological and geographical factors can reduce gene flow, which can lead to population divergence, but we know little of the relative strengths of these phenomena in nature. Here, we use a novel application of structural equation modelling to quan- tify the contributions of ecological and geographical isolation to spatial genetic divergence in 17 species of Anolis lizards.

In the blogosphere
Have you submitted your advice to our “Knowing what I know now” carnival? Why not? Go do that now.
Granting agencies are starting to accept web traffic as an impact metric.
“It is crucial that scientists take more career risks and sound a more realistic, more desperate, note on the global-warming problem.”

Posted in linkfest | Leave a comment

Knowing what I know now: Grad school (Aleeza Gerstein)

Here’s a new contribution to our upcoming Knowing what I know now carnival, from Aleeza Gerstein, who recently completed her PhD with Sally Otto at the University of British Columbia. She is currently splitting her time between Tel Aviv and Minneapolis as an NSERC & Azrieli Postdoctoral Fellow working with Judy Berman on ploidy transitions and the acquisition of drug resistance in Candida albicans.
If you have advice for yourself in a past career stage, find out how to contribute to the carnival here — we’ve got several great contributions already!

012 - A glass of Scotch for Dad's 60th

Celebrate your victories.


Grad school is hard, it’s not just you. Many of the people around you were near the top of their class in undergraduate, so yeah, everyone is smart. The other difficult thing is that there are very few opportunities where positive reinforcement is given (there’s not too many A’s to get in grad school). Unfortunately, it’s just something you have to get used to. Celebrate the victories and try to brush off the failures. My officemates and I kept a bottle of scotch in our office and celebrated every paper published and every award received. But things aren’t always going to work, and sometimes it feels like it never will. It does get better. It’s possible to have what feels like nothing and end up with something great. Perseverance is important. Sometimes all you can do is force yourself to come to work everyday. Just keep going. Try not to lose sight of the big picture, and try to remember that sometimes the biggest discoveries emerge when your project isn’t working out at all like you predicted it would.
Continue reading

Posted in career | Tagged , | 1 Comment